PCR; Scientific Fraud, positively proven 100%

In five minutes you can see that PCR, as a 'test' for COVID-19, is scientifically invalid, being used falsely, and is therefore scientific fraud, plain and simple!

In one hour, by reading this whole article, you will learn what the inventor of PCR had to say about viruses and his PCR invention himself, with specific focus on HIV not being the cause of AIDS; something that NO ONE has ever proven.

You will see how PCR tests are not the same everywhere, they are all being set differently, giving us wholly unreliable results. They are NOT to be used for diagnosis of a disease.

You will also read how many doctors and scientists are all speaking out about the FRAUD that is PCR testing. On reading this, you will then be able to make your own mind up on what's really NOT going on in the World right now, and how PCR testing is being used criminally to amp up the fear of disease and the need for more testing AND vaccines.

What the real experts have to say . . .

“These tests' CANNOT detect free infectious viruses at all”.

“Some of the big truths voters have accepted have little or no scientific basis”

Kary Mullis PhD [Inventor of PCR, Nobel Prize winner, died August 2019]

“I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique. Kary did NOT invent a ‘test.’ He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? NOT medical diagnostics.

He knew that and he always said that.”

Dr David Crowe - friend to Kary Mullis

“A positive PCR does NOT mean that an individual is infected nor infective.

In fact approximately 90% of the PCR positive ‘cases’ are false positives.”

The Great Barrington Declaration

Now signed by over 13,000 scientists and 40,000 medical practitioners

“The World has been shut down for something that is not true. Anyone who has studied infectious disease knows that a PCR test cannot be used to diagnose anything. Anyone who says that anything is being done for any scientific reason is lying.”

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi

“It’s as good as that Scientology test that detects your personality and then tells you that you need to give all your money to Scientology.”

David Rasnick PhD

A quick introduction . . .

I am Deesy. It’s a nickname. I am a middle-aged man, a husband, and a father to three grown-up children who live in another country thousands of miles away. All you need to know about me is that I am human, just like you. Yet, like few of us, I have an appetite for knowing what’s going on regarding our COVID-19 crisis. I feel that I need to know more in order for me to do something about seeing my family, and not just sit back believing all that I am told, doing all that I am told, and accepting all that I am told. That’s not me.

I trust that this is not you either, because, if you’re not paying attention to the biggest fall-out from ORGANISED CRIME in the history of mankind, then more fool you. Crimes of unparalleled magnitude are being committed in broad daylight, in the name of ‘science’, by those with voices that reach far and wide, in the name of ‘health-care intervention’. These profit-driven, heavily-corrupted, well-organised criminals (medical scientists and politicians), are profiteering from the direct demise of the health, wealth, and happiness of the entire human race. And, to add insult to injury, they are blaming you and I for it, because, apparently, according to them, we have a natural ability to destroy each-other; Viruses! And this new one is a bitch!!

From the very beginning . . .

Since March 2020, I have been delving into all aspects of the situation; viruses, vaccines, guidelines, regulations, mandates, masks, symptoms, deaths, statistics, testing, self-isolation, quarantine, travel advice, and so on and so on. In the very simplest of terms, I have been watching what we are being told (BBC, CNN, The Times, Daily Mail, etc etc), and then running off to see if there is evidence for it. Factual, indisputable, never-to-be-called-into-question evidence for all things COVID. And I find NO EVIDENCE, for any of it, NONE AT ALL, with PCR being the biggest example of scientific fraud in this whole wickedly sick and twisted tale of deadly contagion.

After all this research, I have concluded that what we are being told ‘officially’ is not only a gross distortion of the truth, but it is scientific fraud, a fabricated lie being played out in a pre-organised ‘sting’; a good old-fashioned ‘confidence trick’, a ‘con’. Many medical experts, scientists, lawyers, and people of political stature, are now coming forward and saying the very SAME thing; it’s all a giant scam. But, the shame of it is that there are very few getting to hear it. Most of us tune out after hearing what Boris Johnson has to say. We are pissed off with the outcome of his words (no going out, no cinema, no concerts, no gatherings, no Christmas), but most still believe in the core reasons why, unquestioningly. Most believe and defend what Boris and his advisers tell us. Most human beings seem to treat COVID deniers as worthy of burning on the cross. Well, to you people, I say . . .

COVID denial is a hard message to get out, and it often comes under attack from those stupid enough to believe the official story without having made a single one of their own inquiries. This happens to be most all human beings alive today. Yes, most all, predominantly stupid, certainly in when it comes to this issue of such epic proportion, a matter that can present us all with such incredibly unpleasant outcomes. That TV and those newspapers are seriously powerful dumb-down tools . . . for the stupid. For the better-informed, these instruments of propaganda are simply confirmation of the very real sickness among the few who dictate to the many. I cannot watch these lying monsters perpetuate an untruth with such epic consequences, for billions of us, without feeling a sickness inside of me.

I also conclude that we are not all going to die from the flu, and we are not going back to anything resembling ‘normal’ after we take our vaccines. Mask wearing, social distancing, business closures, travel restrictions, work restrictions, and so on . . . ALL here to stay. New governance from here on in; “sit and stay”, or “jab and go”, and it will remain like this until someone that we all trust and believe, one with massive balls and extensive mainstream media exposure, tells us a whole new story - the one that finally exposes what we are experiencing as a LIE. If this doesn’t happen, then we will . . . of course . . . go on believing it. All of it. All the lies. All the test results. All the death stats. All the rules. All the fear. Always. We are all sold on the Germ Theory story, and there seems to be no way out of it because most believe it, and most submit their obedience to it. And there looks to be no one willing to stick their head out to tell us any differently. Although, that said, I am doing my level best to tell those that I hold near and dear to me to see the lie, not to get tested, not to take the vaccine, and go somewhere far away from lockdowns as soon as they can.

These restrictions on our freedoms are here by design, and the designers are running the entire show, top to bottom, so they are here to stay, right up until we see it for what it truly is - a scientific scam, a made-up story. Without seeing it, we cannot move forward. All we do is propel ourselves backwards in keeping up with the dumb-arse ignorance and the spineless obedience. It drives me insane to consider the lack of time and effort most humans put into discovering the truths about our COVID-infected World. Honestly, the laziness and disregard for the lives of others astounds me. And, if this is you included, then wake the f&&k up. Do something. Anything. Read this . . .

The COVID-19 tale is just NOT true, not a single word of it. There is no virus, and never has there been such a weapon of ‘contagion’ among us human beings, certainly not one that’s been scientifically proven. If it were a court case, there would be no evidence to back up its claims. This virus weapon, the one that we think can kill randomly at close range, does not exist. The theory of germs is scientifically unproven. It remains a theory, yet, officially, it sits as the widely-believed backbone to the whole contagion tale. The Germ Theory of deadly viruses causing disease is an unproven story. And that’s all it can ever be; a story. And THAT’s literally what is being told to you, ‘officially’ . . . a STORY.

No virus has ever been proven as the cause of any one disease. Look it up. And the laboratory method called PCR, the one that’s been dressed-up as a ‘test’, tells you the square root of ZERO about anything remotely virus-like. Even the inventor of PCR - who died only a few months before the ‘outbreak’ - say’s that PCR cannot detect what they tell us it is detecting. “It CANNOT detect free viruses”. Kary Mullis did not say “it may not be as accurate as people might like”, or that “you might like to test again just to make sure”, NO!, as what he ACTUALLY said, was that it DOESN’T do what our governmental experts tell us that it does. So, THIS, right here, is the LIE. It’s scientific bullshit. Of that I am 100% POSITIVELY CONVINCED.

Kary Mullis, Noble prize winning scientist and lab expert extraordinaire, had plenty to say about scientific fraud before he died. He spoke openly about how he was ashamed to be associated with what he and other colleagues like him called the “virus-hunters”, those who wanted to blame all dis-ease known to man on viral infections. Many such virus-hunters have even gone to the lengths of spending billions of public and private money on linking certain cancers to a virus.

“Don’t go see Uncle Jack, he’s got cancer, you don’t want to ‘catch’ it!”

Mullis didn’t believe that HIV was the cause of AIDS, because he knew that HIV has NEVER been proven as the cause of AIDS. He was outspoken about the fact that science . . . most ironically . . . doctors the books. He knew what scientists were capable of, and he didn’t like it one bit. Kary Mullis is dead, his PCR is very much alive, and here we all are.

"The more I learned the more outspoken I became. As a responsible scientist convinced that people were being killed by useless drugs, I could not remain silent."

"We have not been able to discover any good reasons why most of the people on Earth believe that AIDS is a disease caused by a virus called HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is true."

"Very little experimental verification has been done to support important societal issues in the closing years of this century. Nor does it have to be done before public policy decisions are made. It only needs to be convincing to the misinformed voter. Some of the big truths voters have accepted have little or no scientific basis."

"What people call science is probably very similar to what was called science in 1634. Galileo was told to recant his beliefs or be excommunicated. People who refuse to accept the commandments of the AIDS establishment are basically told the same thing,

“If you don’t accept what we say, then you’re out.”

Kary Mullis Ph.D - Inventor of PCR; Polymerase Chain Reaction

Nobel Prize winning chemist, born December 28th, 1944, in Lenoir, North Carolina. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1966. He earned a Ph.D. degree in biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972 and lectured in biochemistry there until 1973. That year, Dr. Mullis became a postdoctoral fellow in paediatric cardiology at the University of Kansas Medical School, with emphasis in the areas of angiotensin and pulmonary vascular physiology. In 1977 he began two years of postdoctoral work in pharmaceutical chemistry at the University of California, San Francisco.

Dr. Mullis joined the Cetus Corporation in Emeryville, California, as a DNA chemist in 1979. During his seven years there, he conducted research on oligonucleotide synthesis and invented the Polymerase Chain Reaction. In 1986, he was named director of molecular biology at Xytronyx, Inc. in San Diego, where his work was concentrated in DNA technology and photochemistry. In 1987 began consulting on nucleic acid chemistry for more than a dozen corporations, including Angenics, Cytometrics, Eastman Kodak, Abbott Labs, Milligen/Biosearch, and Specialty Laboratories.

"And so I think it’s part of the fear agenda - they’re telling us there are hundreds of COVID deaths every day, and it’s just not true.

It’s an artefact of a bad testing system; the PCR mass testing system."

Dr Mike Yeadon - Former Chief Scientific Adviser, Pfizer

Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.

Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.

Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.

Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.

Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.

"It’s criminal to say that these are COVID-19 cases. Anyone who has studied infectious disease knows that a PCR test cannot be used to diagnose anything."

"The way of diagnosing this disease, COVID-19, is at variance with everything that anyone learns in infectious diseases. You are using a lab test to make a very serious diagnosis. "

"Not only is the lockdown nonsense, everything else is nonsense. Anyone who says that anything is being done for any scientific reason is lying. This scare, this global panic, has caused man to lose reason, to stop thinking, and to follow the pied-piper’s call."

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi

Born in Washington, DC, and educated at schools in Switzerland, Egypt, and Thailand, he then studied medicine at the University of Bonn in Germany, where he received his MD in 1970. He was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg from 1972 to 1976, and at The Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen from 1976 to 1977.

He joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology at Giessen University in 1977 and was appointed associate professor in 1982. He was named chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz in 1990, where he remained until his retirement in 2012. Dr. Bhakdi has published over three hundred articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.

Putting the test to the test . . .

This piece covers THE most important subject of our time; PCR testing for COVID-19. And, as the title and the opening quote pages suggest, this is very much about the case against it. It is about the well-founded accusation that the test is scientifically invalid, entirely unfit fit-for-purpose, and hence giving us not only false positive results, but also a false perspective on what we are repeatedly told to be a deadly-disease pandemic. “Run for the hills . . . leave all you have behind . . . we are all going to die.”

I am trusting that by reading this piece, you might just alter your views on whether you are hearing the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about COVID-19, and specifically the PCR test that the whole story hangs on. It might just make your jaw drop in astonishment at the fact that this whole World-wide pandemic is based solely on a test that is entirely unfit for purpose, and one that is being abused by way of SCIENTIFIC FRAUD to fulfil a publicly-unknown agenda, one driven in BIG part by the VERY BIG pharmaceutical industry and its World-wide tentacles of influence.

Lobbying (AKA money for policy) has been of great importance to those profiting from us all living in fear of contagious sickness, all those of us now queueing for our untested, as yet unproven, and very profitable cure; vaccines. PCR is a big piece in the influence game for the vaccine pushers. They stand by it, tooth and nail. After all, it creates demand for their product. All they then have to do is supply it, at great global cost . . . annually . . . to billions of us!

It is a fact that the entire COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ story hangs on a test; the PCR test. As at the time of writing (Jan 2021), Worldometer’s website indicates that there have now been 90 million ‘cases’ of COVID-19 recorded World-wide. These are ALL people that we are told to consider as ‘infected’, yet the ONLY reason that they are considered as such is because they have tested positive on a PCR ‘test’. According to these statistics, one in ninety of the World’s entire population have tested positive. But do one in ninety of us die from it? No, of course not. Only one in every four thousand of us have died from it, and even then, this figure includes all those who died with other pre-existing morbidities after having had a positive PCR test in the 28 days prior to their death.

By the way, in the UK recently, this 28 day period, for whatever reason, has just recently been extended to 60 days. This is obviously to increase the death statistics and to amp up the fear.

So, according to official statistics, there are 44 times as many ‘cases’ as there are deaths. It is clear to see that quoting ‘cases’ (now termed ‘infections’) when relaying news updates about COVID is far more engaging and terrifying news than the measly death number, which by most all official statistics appears to be no greater than our average flu season, certainly on a global basis, even including all those who were destined to die in this timeframe from something else anyway.

From what we are told ‘officially’, it is now our common belief that both of these terms, case and infection, tell you that you have a dangerous and deadly virus inside of you, that you are diseased, you have IT, it’s VERY SERIOUS! You are lead to believe that this virus not only puts you at grave risk, but it is one that you can also unknowingly transmit to others. You are then considered high risk, a danger to everyone you come into contact with, regardless of whether you show any symptoms or not, so hence the lockdown measures that billions across the World are enduring.

COVID-19 above all else . . .

These severe and life-changing lockdown measures, we are told, are put in place to stop the spread of this most deadly of viruses. We must place lives first and foremost, with jobs, business, personal freedoms, and other implications such as mental health issues, domestic abuse, and suicides, all considered as of lesser value, even collectively, and hence anything and everything other than COVID-19 are all deemed as necessary sacrifices for the greater good of the long-term health of mankind. All of them combined are still of far lesser importance than COVID-19; a disease that has mostly killed old people with pre-existing conditions, those conditions that are typically considered sufficient enough to be their very real cause of death. This group of people, sick-oldies, is the group with the highest chance of fatality, always, not just now, not just because of COVID. Old people die in far far far greater numbers than the young, always, certainly according to the ‘official’ statistics year on year. And if you struggle to see that as blatantly obvious, then you might struggle to comprehend most anything.

Nothing has changed in this regard. More young people are not dying sooner than expected. That is NOT what anyone is seeing. Period.

Negative from positive . . .

In many countries, if you test positive, you have to self-isolate for 2 weeks, at home, with zero medical supervision or further testing until you have “done your time.” I have experienced this personally, and not one person ever came to check on my whereabouts during the whole 2 weeks. I received no reminder messages relating to my 14-day duty of care to others, nor did I get a call or a home visit. Nothing. I could have gone anywhere, seen anyone, at any time. In fact, I did.

In other countries, even if you test negative upon arrival there, you have to go into forced quarantine for up to two weeks, all under official government-managed medical supervision. Many are left for 14 days in complete isolation, in rooms with no opening windows and no access whatsoever to the outside World. So, no seeing anyone, no walking, no jogging, no going out for a cigarette, nothing, ZERO privileges, locked-in. Food is delivered to your door by someone in a hazmat suit, and the only time you come into direct contact with any others is when you have your next test. This is commonly known as FORCED CONFINEMENT; the incarceration of the healthy.

Having a PCR test may well be quick, but it is unpleasant to go through. Yet, if you test positive, or if you fall into any other designated list or category of those who MUST go into quarantine or confinement, being locked away can be a long and cruel experience for us human beings, who as a species are naturally very social creatures. I have experienced several tests now, all for air travel, and, I have also had to endure one stint of 14-day government-enforced and government-controlled quarantine. I refer to it as prison with carpet and Internet. Being home in self-isolation is bad enough, but state-controlled quarantine is next-level frustrating and unproductive. And for those doing it on their own, which is a great many people, it’s very lonely too.

Added to the above, there are also countries where if you test positive at any time, under any circumstances, you go directly into hospital for quarantine and observation for 10-14 days. So, you could have no symptoms whatsoever, live in a COVID-free area, and you will still be dragged off to hospital to stare at the walls whilst you count down the hours in your wasted hospital bed (remember, you are NOT sick) until your are ‘officially’ released from many days of torment and seriously bad food.

A good friend of mine was taken very ill with food poisoning - suspected salmonella - whilst in quarantine. He went in perfectly healthy, yet came out with what he describes as the worst sickness of his entire life, ten times worse than any flu he had ever had. A medical official there was taken to hospital after eating the same food, and many other paying guests were seriously unwell too. And all this in the name of good healthcare!

I know people who have gone through hospital quarantine too, and not one of them has been tracked and traced after their release, or indeed even so much as followed-up on to see how their health is. Not one. You tested positive, so surely you were assumed to be ill and under threat of acquiring a slight case of death, yet here you are back on the street with no one asking after you, particularly those who should be the very first ones doing so; those in charge of healthcare.

It’s all about the test . . .

All of these lockdown measures are in place ONLY because people are doing PCR testing. Without testing, no one other than the sick would have to endure these things. So, what if the test itself were not fit-for-purpose? What if the test was not able to tell if we were sick or going to be sick, or indeed if we could catch ‘it’ from someone or give ‘it’ to somebody else? What if that were the case? What if PCR was proven as scientifically invalid for the testing of viruses? What then? What would the CASE against PCR look like then? Would it then be fair and just to call the whole charade precisely what it so evidently is: SCIENTIFIC FRAUD!!!

Before we discuss the validity of PCR - what it truly measures and what it truly means - as above, I want for you to pause a second here to consider what our lives might look like without the test. If PCR had not been invented by Kary Mullis and abused by health ‘experts’, we would obviously then only be able to measure the true and very tangible impact of the disease by way of the number of specifically-symptomatic people among us, and the body count of the dead whose lives ‘it’ took. And, even then, we could only measure the number of those who had the very same specific disease symptoms AND no other underlying illness at the time of their death.

The only ones that we could actually, logically, and reasonably, include in our statistics would be those where we saw uniform and specific symptoms as the start of their demise, and also as the ONLY known cause of their death. Other than these glaringly obvious signs of there then being a new deadly diseased among us, we would have no way of measuring who had it and who didn’t, or who died from it and who didn’t. I trust that this makes sense?

No PCR, no virus, no pandemic . . .

So, naturally, we have to wonder what the COVID-19 statistics would look like without the PCR test? No Kary Mullis, no PCR, no PCR ‘test’, no new disease, no lockdowns, no masks, no social distancing, no vaccines, NO DRAMA. That’s the ONLY way that it could possibly be viewed, as NOTHING to worry ourselves about.

Without a PCR test, we would also ONLY know that we had a disease among us by way of a noticeable spike in people getting very sick (with the very same symptoms), as well as similar pro-rata spikes in both the total number of additional bodies in our hospitals and our graveyards. But do you see ALL of this? Do you see ANY of it? Do you personally know many who have died because of it? Is your local community ravaged with the numerous tragic losses of people taken younger than might have been expected, in far greater numbers than normal, and by something that started seemingly so innocently as a cough, a headache, and a loss of taste?

My opinion, carefully considered from seeing what I have seen and hearing what I have heard, is that anyone living anywhere, across the entire World, cannot honestly answer this as a “YES, I’ve seen exactly that.” This ‘too-many-dying’ experience has not fallen upon ANY of us. Yes, of course, people are dying, just as they do every single day everywhere in the World, but does PCR really offer us confirmation that it is has given us indisputable evidence of the very specific clinical diagnosis of a new viral disease called COVID-19?

Does the so-called ‘test’ have a direct link to death? No! It does NOT. Are the chances high that if you test positive you might die? No! Of course NOT! If you test positive, it does NOT mean that you will die from COVID-19. In fact, if you are not old, sick, and near death already, your chances of that happening are somewhere between ‘zero’ and ‘statistically insignificant’. However the stress of the result may well make you feel anxious for a few days, but when you realise that you are perfectly fine, you’ll be bouncing around, just like ‘normal’, just as you were previously. You were healthy, and you still are healthy.

You don’t need to be a doctor to realise that millions of people are showing as being ‘infected’ when tested, but not showing it to the outside World with any symptoms whatsoever. No coughing, no sneezing, no high temperature. Nothing! Yet, all testing positive, and all then treated like the great unclean purely BECAUSE of the test, all bundled into their own homes, quarantine facilities or hospitals, all well out of the way of others. And, because they test positive, we all have to suffer, billions of us. It’s like a kid in school swearing at a teacher and then everyone being kept behind because of it. “But Miss, it was him, not us!”.

If we were ever to have believed a word of this COVID fiasco, then surely those first words should have been: “It’s possibly a bad strain of flu, so we advise that you protect the old and the immunocompromised. Otherwise, carry on as you are.”

Now that, I would have welcomed, that I would have listened to, that I would have gone along with. But all of THIS?! All of THIS . . . for a sickness that has seemingly lived among us since time began. We get a cold, we get the flu. It’s a common experience for all human beings. Yet now, because we are told differently, and the ‘test’ enforces the story, those colds and flus that have remained very stagnant for a very long time, have mutated, overnight, into deadly killers. And, as I am repeating as much as possible, it’s just not true.

What do you believe . . ?

Do you really believe the whole deadly-killer story to be 100% true? Is this born from what you are seeing on TV, or is it born from what you are experiencing as your personal COVID journey? We all connect now with each-other, its not as if lockdown has stopped us listening or stopped us talking. We are sharing more now than ever before, and many of us have much more time on our hands to spend a little of it looking into what’s really going on. Yet, it would seem that the one thing that we do not openly share among ourselves is helpful information relating to the biggest crisis in the history of mankind; COVID-19. It’s as if people are reluctant to stick their neck out for sake of ridicule. What might people think if I start speaking out against the government? I don’t want to offend anyone. It’s as if the ‘quiet-believers’ are going to have MI5 or FBI agents come storming in through the windows to take them away for lobotomising so they shall never be able to speak out again.

It’s OK not to agree with everything that we are told. In fact, in my opinion, it’s dangerous to agree, certainly when it comes to the issue of COVID-19. Imagine our children, would we teach them to believe everything everyone tells us, regardless of who they are, who they are connected to, and what their intentions might be? Would any sane parent teach their child that its perfectly OK to take everything on board as truth, unquestioningly? Of course NOT! And those who preach these words upon their own kids and do precisely the opposite themselves need to take a moment to consider the gains that could be harnessed from acknowledging their own hypocrisies. If it’s good enough advice for our children, then surely it’s good enough for us?

Lets not forget that prior to COVID-19, before the lie, if Dave from Accounts had his girlfriend call in to say that he was going to be off work for a few days with the flu, we didn’t pass round a collection tin to help cover his impending funeral, nor did we call his family to send them our condolences in advance of their imminently tragic loss. We simply wished Dave better, and we then saw him back at work a few days later when he was clearly perfectly healthy again. We didn’t avoid him, or rush him into the store cupboard for two weeks, feeding him though a hole in the wall until it was deemed safe to let him out again. In most part, we simply just let him be. We didn’t track him to see who he was coming into contact with, with us then avoiding them also. We didn’t wear masks if and when we saw him, and none among us would suggest that he have a vaccine in the interests of public health.

If we had experienced the flu before, and we considered that catching it again next year was too much of a risk to handle, then we, and only WE, could decide on whether to take a flu jab. If we did, we did, and if we didn’t, who cared? “Absolutely NO ONE” is the answer to that one.

The flu used to be an irritation, a pain in the arse that got in the way of our best-laid plans, a feeling of uselessness and sickness, yes, but one that is utterly ridiculous to compare to things that typically kill us. A flu is not cancer. It’s not heart disease. But now, in this World, the one fuelled by our collective fear of the mutating invisible enemy, we believe that a new strain of the same thing - the common cold and flu - has turned overnight into man’s self-made weapon of species destruction. Those dirty Chinese ate bats, and now we’re all paying the price, all in danger of imminent death. How bad do we believe that this coronavirus strain could be? What are the death-toll numbers? How do they compare? Is it worse than cancer? Is it worse than heart disease? Is it worse than those killed by pills taken as prescribed by Doctors?

Well, in fact, NO, it’s not bigger than any of the above. In fact, more people die each year from taking drugs as prescribed by Doctors (both in and out of hospital) than they have done from COVID-19. Does this shock you? Should it? Did you have any idea that medical interventions could cause so much harm?

Like most all that I write, you will have to verify this little gem for yourself. If I use a reference point, then all the die-hard COVID believers will rush to Wikipedia to find some dirt on whoever my reference points to, or if an organisation, they’ll find some distant link to a string of serial-killing pedophiles that the company innocently sold something to back in 1947. It’s also not necessary for me to reference this, as all that should really happen here, is that YOU, in your newly-found state of ‘not -believing-everything-that-you-are-told’, go off and check it out . . . for yourself. It’s out there to be found, that’s for sure.

Back to Dave . . .

Thanks to PCR, Dave from accounts, once positively tested, in 2021, is now labelled as unclean, strictly forbidden to see a single soul, his friends avoiding him like rotten fish. He has to isolate himself from all social contact. And, we, the uninfected, call him outrageously irresponsible if he so much as steps foot out of his house. Many among us would even tell on him. And, God help him if he escapes from lockdown and brazenly meet others, in numbers, without a mask on! Just think this through, comparing the old flu with the new one. It’s crazy-nuts-crazy! Literally, there is no other way for me to describe how this makes me feel. It’s insanity personified.

We are now terrifyingly afraid of something that we gave almost zero consideration to only one year ago. The only smart thing we did back in 2019 was to allow Dave from the office some time, some space, and some privacy to recover, as well as possibly offering him some help with his shopping, feeding his cat, or taking the kids to school for him. We always knew that he would be back. And, in that respect, nothing has changed. It’s not as if our healthy young are being conscripted by virtue of their infection and having to go off to fight an unwelcome war against COVID. Are our urban windows filled with the sadness-soaked faces of mothers longing for the return of their wee babies? Of course NOT!

This year though, things have moved incredibly, the old and the immunocompromised, and those with serious pre-existing conditions, are pretty much the only ones who are at odds not to return from the fear-filled diagnosis of COVID. And, I hasten to add, that this is precisely the SAME as it’s always been with any flu, ever. The oldies die. We all get old, we all die. And unless I really have been too immersed in this whole PCR thing, I am fairly sure that there’s been no news of a cure for death of late.

What does the inventor of PCR have to say?

Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, did not believe that HIV caused AIDS. HIV is a virus and AIDS is a disease, just as SARS-CoV-2 is a virus and COVID-19 is a disease. He believed that his test did not and could not prove that HIV was the cause of AIDS. Yet, here we all are, in 2021, still most all of us in the firm belief that AIDS is a disease that results in the ‘catching’ of HIV from someone else who is ‘infected’. Whether you are a monkey, a junkie, a gay man, or all three, our generally accepted perception is that you ‘acquired’ AIDS from someone else just like you. But, would you be surprised to hear that the link between HIV and AIDS has NEVER BEEN PROVEN?

It is obvious after researching Mullis that he has no time whatsoever for Anthony Fauci, the Head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in America. Fauci is the front man in terms of viral diseases, and when it comes to COVID-19 he has taken even greater prominence in promoting the fear of the pandemic. This is what Mullis had to say of him in an interview segment about HIV, AIDS, and the ABC Network:

“What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.”

“Human beings are full of retroviruses, we don’t know if it is hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands. We’ve only recently started to look for them. But they’ve never killed anybody before. People have always survived retroviruses.”

Back in March of 2020, when lockdowns were first announced for the UK, I began intensely researching COVID-19, and of late, specifically PCR testing. I had heard a few things back in March 2020 that had made me suspicious of what we were being told by the likes of Boris Johnson, Chris Whitty, and Matt Hancock, the last two named here being those with publicly noted conflicts of interest in the COVID pandemic, all care of their financial connections with pharmaceutical companies, the likes of those with very deep pockets who produce COVID-19 associated products such as PCR tests, PPE equipment, vaccines, and so on.

One of the little snippets that got me looking specifically towards the PCR testing protocols, was hearing that the inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, was very outspoken about the connection between HIV and AIDS, with his immovable and well-evidenced knowing, even until his death-bed, being that there was no scientifically proven connection. So, if this was the case, then how possible that the inventor of something that is being used for the detection of viruses had such strong views on another World-famous disease that was also created by an alleged virus? Or did he invent PCR for another purpose, and NOT for the clinical diagnosis of contagious diseases? Well, let’s see . . .

I got my hands on a book written by Kary Mullis in 1999 called Dancing Naked In The Mind Field. On page 105, Mullis, who won a Nobel prize in Chemistry for his amazing laboratory invention for DNA amplification, had this to say about inventing PCR; polymerase chain reaction:

"I was a professional scientist, and I knew what I had discovered. It was not the speculations of a kid about the universe and time reversal. It was a chemical procedure that would make the structures of the molecules of our genes as easy to see as bill-boards in the desert and as easy to manipulate as Tinkertoys."

"PCR would not require expensive equipment, and it would find tiny fragments of DNA and multiply them billions of times. And it would do it quickly. I knew that PCR would spread across the World like wildfire."

From reading his book, it is clear that he was immensely proud of his achievement, and of course, for his Nobel Prize. Yet, as above, another thing that is also very clear is that he did not believe that HIV was the cause of AIDS:

"Very little experimental verification has been done to support important societal issues in the closing years of this century. Nor does it have to be done before public policy decisions are made. It only needs to be convincing to the misinformed voter. Some of the big truths voters have accepted have little or no scientific basis. And these include the belief that AIDS is caused by Human Immunodeficiency Virus."

In addition to this book, Dancing Naked In The Mind Field, Mullis also co-authored one other book, this one, quite simply called The Polymerase Chain Reaction. I looked for more printed words by Mullis and stumbled across one called Inventing The AIDS Virus, written by Dr Peter Duesberg. Mullis had written the Foreword in this book, so I ordered it to see what he had to say.

Inventing The AIDS Virus is one of the most controversial medical books ever written, as Duesberg claims that the cause of AIDS is not a virus, but the result of a toxic lifestyle lived by those who got it. To many of the ‘virus-hunters’, as Duesberg refers to them, those working in the “HIV = AIDS establishment”, his work is considered as heretic, with many claiming that he is a disgrace to his profession. Yet, all of those who claim this of Duesberg do so with NO EVIDENCE whatsoever to back up their claims of this viral infection; HIV = AIDS . . . the one that most all 7.8 billion of us believe to be true. I say again, in the words of Kary Mullis:

“Some of the big truths voters have accepted

have little or no scientific basis.”

But, here, mine is not to comment on the subject of HIV and AIDS according to Duesberg’s 722-page book, but more so to relay what Mullis had to say about it when writing his Foreword, which is far more relevant to our current World pandemic crisis:

In 1998 I was working as a consultant at Speciality Labs in Santa Monica, setting up analytic routines for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). I knew a lot about setting up analytic routines for anything with nucleic acids in it because I had invented the Polymerase Chain Reaction. That’s why they had hired me.

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), on the other hand, was something I did not know a lot about. Thus, when I found myself writing a report on our progress and goals for the project, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, I recognised that I did not know the scientific reference to support a statement I had just written: “HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.”

After ten or fifteen meetings over a couple of years, I was getting pretty upset when no one could cite the reference. I didn’t like the ugly conclusion that was forming in my mind: The entire campaign against a disease increasingly regarded as the Black Plague was based on a hypothesis whose origins no one could recall. That defied both scientific and common sense.

Finally, I had the opportunity to question one of the giants in HIV and AIDS research, Dr Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute, when he gave a talk in San Diego. it would be the last time that I would be able to ask my little question without showing anger, and I figured Montagnier would know the answer. So I asked him.

With a look of condescending puzzlement, Montagnier said, “Why don’t you quote the report from the Centers for Disease Control?”

I replied, “It doesn’t really address the issue of whether or not HIV is the probable cause of AIDS, does it?”

“No,” he admitted, no doubt wondering when I would just go away. He looked for support to the little circle of people around him, but they were all awaiting a more definitive response, like I was.

“Why don’t you quote the work on SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency Virus)?” the good doctor offered.

“I read that too, Dr Montagnier,” I responded. “What happened to those monkeys didn’t remind me of AIDS. Besides, that paper was just published only a couple of months ago. I’m looking for the original paper where somebody showed that HIV caused AIDS.”

This time, Montagnier’s response was to walk quickly away to greet an acquaintance across the room.

After then explaining how he met Dr Peter Duesberg, and then how Duesberg explained to him that the reason he couldn’t find any references linking HIV to AIDS was because there were none, Mullis finishes off the book’s foreword as follows:

I like and respect Peter Duesberg. I don’t think he knows necessarily what causes AIDS; we have disagreements about that. But we’re both certain about what doesn’t cause AIDS. We have not been able to discover any good reasons why most of the people on Earth believe that AIDS is a disease caused by a virus called HIV. There is simply no scientific evidence demonstrating that this is true.

We have also not been able to discover why doctors prescribe a toxic drug called AZT (Zidovudine) to people who have no other complaint than the presence of antibodies to HIV in their blood. In fact, we cannot understand why humans would take that drug for any reason. We cannot understand how all this madness came about, and having both lived in Berkeley, we’ve seen some strange things indeed. We know that to err is human, but the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake. I say this rather strongly as a warning. Duesberg has been saying it for a long time.

On reading this you may think to yourself that this is madness on steroids, of course HIV is the cause of AIDS, surely everyone knows that?! But, as you can see, neither Mullis, the inventor of PCR, nor Duesberg, the prolific researcher and lifetime scientific medical man, believe it to be so. And, after reading Inventing The AIDS Virus, as well as many other books relating to contagious diseases of all kinds and the generally accepted ‘Germ Theory’ adopted by these ‘virus-hunters’, I don’t believe it either.

The virus SARS-CoV-2, the one that is supposed to be the pathogen that gives us COVID-19, has NEVER been isolated. A clean, unspoilt, perfect sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus does NOT exist. So, in addition to the PCR method being used fraudulently to identify whether we have a virus inside of us, we also have to recognise that we have no idea what it is looking for. No one does.

Many investigate journalists have requested that national health institutes across the World produce indisputable evidence of the isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It’s now one year on, and NO ONE has produced such evidence. It’s like me saying that I have a stuffed 15th Century Dodo above the fire in my lounge, but I don’t have to prove it to you. And, in FACT, if you pressed me very hard to prove it to you, I obviously could not do so. But, I say that I have one, and you’ll just have to take my word for it.

I think that it’s high time we asked these virus-hunters to demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that viruses are the cause of all the diseases that they claim them to be. We are locked down now as the result of a so-called ‘test’ that cannot possibly be looking for whole viruses in us, as SARS=CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified. As above, SCIENTIFIC FRAUD!

The PRC process, for all to understand . . .

Imagine that you work in a laboratory and you want to make really small things easier to find. Back in the day you used a microscope, allowing you to see small things in far more detail. Then followed electron-microscopes, advanced technology that allowed lab technicians to go even deeper into the world of smallness. These methods are both those where you can literally ‘see’ the results that you would see with your own eye if it possessed such power of magnification or zoom. What you are seeing is actually there, but it is the equipment that has brought it into view with the naked eye for you to study. One method is clever lenses positioned to magnify something, the other is imagery taken and then blow up to a greater size. Yes, a very basic explanation of microscopes and electron-microscopes, I know, but unless you are a lab technician (which I am not either), you need know no more than this.

The PCR testing process is absolutely NOT to be confused with either of the above methods for looking at small stuff. PCR is not literally viewing viruses and offering them to you as images. What happens, in relation to viruses, is that PCR is pre-programmed to go looking for something very specific - something that is said to be entirely specific to that one virus - and then to identify a match. It’s a chemical process, not a viewing process. It uses segments of genetic code from a virus to go looking for more of it. If it finds it, the test will say positive, if not, then it’s negative. That’s the ‘THEORY.’

That description of mine can obviously be criticised by many scientists and lab technicians, but it can also hopefully explain to you in a language that you might understand, what PCR is supposed to be doing, and how it is doing it. This pre-programming - where they set the test to go looking for its target, in this case tiny segments of the DNA make up of the SARS-CoV-2 virus - is called ‘sequencing’. It’s like giving a police dog the scent of a hunted man from a piece of his clothing. PCR is not looking ‘at’ the object being hunted like you would thought a microscope, it is looking ‘for’ the specific scent, the common match, a DNA match. PCR, unlike microscopes of any kind, is not magnified reality, and it’s not a blown up image of everything in its field of view. PCR is not an ‘open-view’ technique. It is programmed to go looking for specific DNA pieces and it goes off looking for a match, and when it finds it . . . BOOM . . . POSITIVE!

Imagine an enormously long string of random numbers stretching into the tens of thousands, all side by side. Now imagine that somewhere in among these numbers is a very short string of them, all together, all in the same order as a sequence allegedly found in a known virus. This specific segment of numbers is now set as the thing that PCR goes looking for. There is a database of all known virus DNA sequences (which is not many), and it is these specific sequences that become the scent that PCR goes hunting for to match up with. PCR is pre-programmed for the hunting down of a specific gene sequence, in this case that for SARS-CoV-2. So we are told.

SARS-CoV-2, according to scientists who claim to have isolated it, is what PCR is set (sequenced) to look for. However, you now know that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated from a symptomatically sick human being anywhere in the World, ever, so it begs the question: “How can you possibly ‘set’ the PCR process to go looking for something that’s never been found?” Are PCR test kits truly looking for SARS-CoV-2? What if they are NOT set to look for it?

Time to hear from Professor Dolores Cahill . . .

University College Dublin (2005-present). More than 20 years expertise in high-throughput protein & antibody array, proteomics technology development, automation & biomedical applications in biomarker discovery, diagnostics & personalised medicine. This lady knows a thing or two about medical science, and is openly calling out governments for the propagation of scientific fraud. I thought you might like to hear what she has uncovered:

This whole lockdown is based on positive PCR tests, but actually, in the diagnostic World, in PCR, you would never just diagnose with either a positive or a negative, you have to sequence what the test is measuring. Fifteen-hundred PCR tests were sequenced in October 2020, and ALL of them were Influenza A & B, and not one was SARS-CoV-2.The legislation of the lockdown and the so-called ‘pandemic’ and ‘public health emergency’ is based on the causative agent of COVID-19 being a coronavirus.

What Professor Cahill is saying here is that the 1,500 PCR tests she refers to were obviously ALL ‘set’ to look for Influenza A and B virus sequences, and NOT for the SARS-CoV-2 virus that purportedly causes COVID-19. These PCR tests were NOT looking for the virus that we are told they are looking for! She then continues:

I am personally going to sequence PRC, with informed consent, from people in Ireland and the UK. If those sequences are not SARS-CoV-2, which I think would be a biological impossibility in January 2021, I am intending to take an injunction in Ireland, to the High Court, if the sequences come back as influenza, that the government cannot be reporting cases as COVID-19 or coronavirus, they have to be influenza. And the medical doctors can be sued under medical negligence by people who have false diagnosis.

Ministers and Prime Ministers are spending people’s money under procurement, and there are commercial contracts. They should be testing whether these tests are testing for SARS-CoV-2 or something else. If they are spending money, and what the tests are detecting is not the causative agent SARS-CoV-2, then they are engaging in fraud, and that is malfeasance in public office, which is a crime. And any indemnity they may have had does not apply if they have not done their duty of care to check that the testing was correct.

Every country should be launching the sequencing of the PCR tests themselves. This will stop the lockdowns World-wide, because all of the legislation is based on SARS-CoV-2.

So . . . WHO was Kary Mullis?

Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, died Aug. 7 [2019] of pneumonia at the age of 74. He won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for copying and amplifying DNA. Mullis invented the PCR method in 1983 as a chemist at Cetus Corporation. Mullis was born in Lenoir, North Carolina, in 1944. He received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1966 and a PhD in biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972. He joined Cetus in 1979. In 1986, he became the director of molecular biology at Xytronyx. And starting in 1987, he worked as a consultant on nucleic acid chemistry for multiple companies.

The original version of PCR that Mullis developed uses repeated cycles of elevated temperatures to separate DNA strands, which are then copied by a heat-stable DNA polymerase. Repeating the cycle many times leads to an exponential increase in the quantity of DNA. In this way, even traces of DNA can be amplified into amounts that can be easily sequenced or quantified. PCR amplification played a key role in the Human Genome Project, in which most of the DNA blueprint of one person was sequenced. Beyond his work on PCR, Mullis was also known for his controversial views disputing humans’ role in climate change and HIV’s role in AIDS. He also was open about taking hallucinogenic drugs like LSD and synthesising some when in graduate school.

[Above taken from his obituary on the website of Chemical & Engineering News, can.acs.org]

Note here how Chemical & Engineering News do NOT use the term PCR ‘test’, but they refer to it as the PCR ‘method’. It must be noted again and again that Mullis did NOT invent PCR as a test for detecting viruses, nor did he invent it for diagnosing disease. These were not his intentions. His aim was simply to amplify unfathomably small fragments of DNA for many differing uses in laboratory research. He did a good job of that too, as the company that he worked for at the time, Cetus Corporation, sold the PCR technology rights on to a pharmaceutical giant called Hoffmann-La Roche (now known as Roche) for $300 million US.

As an aside here, Roche, the current owners of the PCR technology, according to Wikipedia, is the World’s largest pharmaceutical company, with revenues in 2019 in excess of $70 BILLION US ($70,000,000,000), assets in excess of $90 BILLION US ($90,000,000,000), and a staff of nearly 100,000 World-wide. They are what is commonly now referred to as BIG Pharma, and for very good reason too, as they sell a LOT of drugs and they make a LOT of money. And just to put their size into perspective here, their annual revenue is greater than the GDP of 124 of the 189 countries listed for 2017, making them comparatively more powerful financially than over 65% of the World’s nations in that year. One company, financially greater than two thirds of all nations!!!

And this is just one BIG pharmaceutical company. The top ten in the World have combined revenues in excess of $400 BILLION per year, a number smaller than only 15% of the World’s nations’ own GDP numbers. Only 27 nations in the World are bigger than these top ten pharmaceutical companies. These ten companies have revenue streams that are unimaginably HUGE. They are gargantuan businesses. So, when people tell me that they don’t believe that politicians, scientists, and medical professionals could possibly have been corrupted, I refer them to these stats and ask them to question how they could possibly consider it beyond the realms of anything other than probable reality.

Back to the CASE at hand; PCR and its inventor . . .

I had read what Mullis had to say in black and white, but I then progressed onto seeing what he had to say in person, watching the very few video pieces of him that are available now online. As with most anything that goes against the ‘official’ narrative relating to COVID-19, a great deal of what Mullis had to say about the virus-hunters has been taken down, banned, or deleted forever.

These videos that I did manage to find gave me a far better measure of the man, and most importantly and more specifically, his thinking on modern medicine and its eternal hunt for contagious viruses as the blame for countless diseases - those such as AIDS and COVID-19. And, as before, these virus-hunters have also tried to pin cancer on contagion too over the years.

Sorry, what’s that? You’ve got cancer? Where have you been? Who did you catch it from?”

Dr Rashid Buttar, author of a book called Nine Steps To Keep The Doctor Away, led me to a filmed interview with Mullis. What he was being interviewed for, and by whom, I have no idea, but he certainly had plenty to say about Anthony Fauci, the 80 year old infectious disease adviser to Donald Trump and many other Presidents before him. Fauci steers America’s stance on all things ‘contagion’, even now under the command of President Biden. Anthony Fauci is the long-standing (37 years) head of America’s National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID). This is what Kary Mullis had to say about him:

Anthony Fauci doesn’t know anything about anything, and I would say that to his face. Nothing! The man thinks you can take a blood sample, stick it in an electron microscope, and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. He should NOT be in a position like he is in.

Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. Those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to. Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.

You can’t expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference really. I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but basically the vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. That’s the main problem actually with science in this century, because science is being judged by people, and funding is being done by people who don’t understand it. Who do we trust? Fauci? Fauci doesn’t know enough.

As you can see, these are strong words from the inventor of PCR about the one man who has been at the helm of everything disease-based in America for many decades. It makes me wonder what Mullis might have to say about Fauci’s endorsement of current lockdown measures across the World if he were alive today? And would Mullis be telling us that his PCR method, being used as a ‘test’, is telling us the truth about positive results, or would he be telling us that it was being used fraudulently, as has been suggested now by many trusted scientists across the World?

PCR simply CANNOT be used as clinical diagnosis for COVID-19, and it seems clear that any well-intentioned doctor would tell you precisely the same thing, just as they are doing. Genuine doctors with true care for the well-being of mankind are speaking up about the official medical advice that we are all receiving through our TVs and in our mainstream press. Just like with Trump and Biden, the medical profession is separated enormously. There are the official gang who state that SARS-CoV-2 is the direct cause of a new disease called COVID-19, and that all measures currently in place are justifiably there to protect us all. And then there is the ‘unofficial’ gang who don’t agree with the diagnosis through PCR, they oppose lockdowns, they don’t agree with the wearing of masks, they don’t agree with social distancing, and they don’t agree with vaccines.

They don’t all agree on the same things, of course, because a great deal of it falls down to personal opinion and previous teachings and experiences. This applies to those on the official side and the unofficial side. It’s a tragic shame that Mullis died only months before this pandemic was declared, as comments from him would surely now be THE most welcome?!

I did look into Mullis’s death to see if there were any strange circumstances, like he had committed suicide by shooting himself with a sniper’s rifle from 500 yards away, but there seemed to be nothing sinister to be found, so I shall not dwell on the thought that his death may have been foul-play. So, unless we hear otherwise, we can say no more than that his death in 2019 was extremely bad timing, certainly for those billions among us who have endured such never-seen-before measures, as well as the immeasurable emotional and financial suffering as a direct result of his PCR method being used fraudulently as a test.

Before I move away from quoting Kary Mullis and his PCR achievements, here are a few more sound-bites from his own book, mostly those where he strongly criticises the medical establishment, specifically the “HIV = AIDS establishment”, and particularly those who are also determined to demonstrate that all diseases are contagious, and not the result of bad diet, the polluted environment, and our general every-day lifestyles:

The CDC continues to add new diseases to the grand AIDS definition. The CDC has virtually doctored the books to make it appear as if the disease continues to spread. In 1993, for example, the CDC enormously broadened its AIDS definition. This was happily accepted by county health authorities, who receive $2,500 from the feds per year under the Ryan White Act for every reported AIDS case.

What people call science is probably very similar to what was called science in 1634. Galileo was told to recant his beliefs or be excommunicated. People who refuse to accept the commandments of the AIDS establishment are basically told the same thing. “If you don’t accept what we say, then you’re out.”

The more I learned the more outspoken I became. As a responsible scientist convinced that people were being killed by useless drugs, I could not remain silent.

A proper scientific reference is usually a published article in a reliable scientific magazine. These days the magazines are all slick glossy paper with pictures on the front and lots of advertisements, a lot of editorial material by people who are professional journalists, and a few pictures of girls selling you things you might want to buy for your lab. The advertisers are the companies who make things for scientists to buy and the companies who make drugs for doctors to sell. There are no major journals without advertisements. Therefore, there are no major journals without corporate connections.

If you don’t accept what we say, then you’re out.

How deadly is corrupted advice . . ?

Moving away from how Mullis felt about the aptly named ‘virus-hunters’, I also looked at what other accomplished and credible medical professionals were saying about PCR testing being the foundation of our current World COVID-19 crisis. One I see as being very vocal about the PCR deception is Dr Mike Yeadon, ex Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of the A&R Research Unit of Pfizer, one of the World’s largest pharmaceutical companies (some say the biggest) and one of those destined to profit from the manufacture of billions of COVID-19 vaccines.

Dr Yeadon describes SAGE, the UK government’s COVID Crisis Advisory Board as:

“lethally incompetent”

They simply do not possess the range of skills, and experience, and ideally, independence, that would enable them to provide good advice to government, so that government can decide what to do. For example, I was shocked when I went through the names in the Spring when they were released and I didn’t find someone that I would think of as a card-carrying immunologist.

So they just simply didn’t have anybody, there were no pathologists on SAGE. And don’t you find that surprising when we are attributing hundreds of people’s deaths to COVID every day when it’s not true? It’s just not true. And we know this because I am working closely with some extremely good diagnostic pathologists. And why haven’t they [SAGE] got one?

I am sure that the mathematicians on the group do feel that what is being broadcast is accurate, but it’s not. And so I think it’s part of the fear agenda - they’re telling us there are hundreds of COVID deaths every day, and it’s just not true. It’s an artefact of a bad testing system; the PCR mass testing system.

Where are all the people I worked with for the last 30 years, really clever people, people who understand systems biology, immunology, where are you? Why is it that I am standing up here? I have done nothing for 6 months but this.

When you see Dr Yeadon speaking on the COVID issue, you can see that he is disappointed that many of his colleagues in the medical profession are staying silent on the most important of all medical issues ever presented to them. He repeatedly encourages others like him to come forward and call out the PCR test for COVID-19 for what it truly is - SCIENTIFIC FRAUD!

There are numerous other medical professionals, virologists, microbiologists, epidemiologists, and general practitioners, who are all voicing out about the scientific and medical invalidity of the PCR test. Another among these is retired Professor, Sucharit Bhakdi, a highly-revered professional who has worked in medical biology and infectious diseases all his life. This is what he has to say about the whole situation, including PCR being used as testing for COVID-19:

The story is out of this World, it cannot be true. The World has been shut down for something that is not true. Why do you believe everything that you are being told? Why don’t you sit down and read and think a bit? Because, if you did that, you would very quickly realise that there is something very very fishy going on.

Then this PCR test came out as the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19. Now, anyone who has studied infectious disease knows that a PCR test cannot be used to diagnose anything. PCR is a lab test that may be used to support a diagnosis. A PCR test only looks at parts of the virus genome, very small parts. A reasonable doctor doesn’t go around testing people with a test that has never been out on the market for use to diagnose a disease. It’s only there to see if you have parts of this virus genome sitting around in your throat or your nose.

A positive PCR test does not mean that you are infected. The cycle threshold has never been standardised. The way of diagnosing this disease, COVID-19, is at variance with everything that anyone learns in infectious diseases. You are using a lab test to make a very serious diagnosis. It’s criminal to say that these are COVID-19 cases. Of the 10,000 COVID deaths in Germany, 90% were deaths due to other causes, like heart attack or stoke or whatever, but it just happens that they tested positive for this damned virus.

The World’s most foremost epidemiologist, Professor John Ioannidis of Stamford actually published a paper that was peer-reviewed, which means that it was seen by three to four experts, leading experts in the field, and the WHO put this paper on its bulletin, which means that they accept it as the correct data. John Ioannidis said what we said months go, that this virus is no more deadly than a seasonal flu, and for people under 70 it is even less deadly. Five out of ten thousand may die from this virus. This is so little that there is no reason to do anything. Not only is the lockdown nonsense, everything else is nonsense. Anyone who says that anything is being done for any scientific reason is lying.

This scare, this global panic, has caused man to lose reason, to stop thinking, and to follow the pied-piper’s call. Mask wearing in public has never been shown to do anything but bad things. Nothing! It has never been shown that pre-symptomatic people will cause the disease in others. Someone who does not have symptoms simply cannot get enough virus out into the air to make another person ill.

Last time I looked, 35,000 physicians and scientists have signed the Great Barrington Declaration. The dissenting voices are now a much much larger number than the voices that are trying to put this whole agenda through. Everything that Boris Johnson and Merkel said was wrong. Why should anyone believe them? They are rigging the numbers, they are falsifying the numbers, and they are telling lies. This is the simple truth.

This PCR test is not perfect. In fact it is very imperfect. Anyone with any inkling of epidemiology knows that when the number of cases falls below a certain level you must stop testing people without symptoms. If you test them you’re just going to get more false-positives than true-positives.This whole business about an immunity health pass is stupid. I would not take the vaccine. I am not mad. It’s inhumane to do what they are doing with lockdowns. We should be talking about why and how our society has allowed these things to happen. And we must try to get answers to those so that this will never happen again.

The Great Barrington Declaration . . .

Continuing on with the “PCR test is scientific fraud” demonstration, I wanted to highlight to you one of those groups of medical practitioners who are trying to get the word out. This group consist of many very highly respected names in their field, and they are backed up by thousands of other fellow professionals, all of them voicing the SAME message.

When people say that they wholly believe what they are being told by the World’s health experts, such as Tony Fauci, Chris Whitty or Matt Hancock, it is important for us all to take note that there are literally tens of thousands of scientists and physicians who do NOT agree with the measures taken, particularly lockdowns, and many have been compassionate and intelligent enough to speak out about it. Yet, due to relentless social-media censorship and the mainstream media’s lack of debate on the COVID-19 issue, many among us are entirely unaware of such differing opinion from those with an untold wealth of health knowledge, including prominent professors at Harvard, Oxford, and Stamford.

It is patently clear to anyone who has looked behind the ‘official’ story to see that lockdown measures, quarantine, masks, and social distancing are harming more of us than the alleged new disease itself. This is best highlighted by a quick reading of The Great Barrington Declaration, which has now (January 2021) been signed by over 13,000 medical and public health scientists, as well as over 40,000 medical practitioners.

Whilst we are getting our health advice in the U.K. from the same few self-proclaimed ‘experts’, daily, on repeat, with no debate whatsoever, there are now hundreds of thousands of medical professionals and scientists across the World who are calling them out on their misguided and wholly unnecessary measures. Can these thousands upon thousands of experts all be conspiracy theorists, or are they genuine people with sincere care for human health that are simply trying to tell the rest of the World that what we are being told is entirely untrue? They are calling out the lie.

On October 4, 2020, The Great Barrington Declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by the following hugely eminent professors:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modelling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

What does The Great Barrington Declaration say about PCR testing . . ?

TESTING - FALSE POSITIVES

PCR tests cannot be verified for accuracy as there is no ‘gold standard’ against which to check them. The virus has not been purified. PCR tests cannot detect viral loads and are prone to false positives. A positive PCR test does not mean that an individual is infected nor infective.

In fact approximately 90% of the PCR positive ‘cases’ are false positives. We therefore have no second wave and no pandemic. The government’s report estimates a false positive rate of between 0.8 to 4.0 % using data from other viral infections – not from covid.

Viral fragments may remain in people’s bodies for several weeks following recovery from infection.

The crisis will never end if we are waiting for zero positive tests. Everyone has probably had a cold caused by a coronavirus and will likely have a few viral fragments matching those of the cousin SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Testing healthy asymptomatic individuals is non-sensical, unscientific and a colossal waste of money. The governments moon shot daily testing program will cost £100 Billion, roughly two thirds of the annual NHS budget.

Antibody testing is not the gold standard as many people have T-cell immunity, and antibodies may not circulate following recovery from infection.

The cycle of untruths . . .

Up to now I have not mentioned PCR ‘cycles’. Many scientists will tell you that the more cycles the PCR ‘test’ is passed through, the greater the number of false results you get. These are known as ’false-positives’. So, if you take one test that is set at 20 cycles, you may test negative, yet the very same test set at 40 cycles will invariably show you as positive. Same person, same day, same test (save for the cycle count), completely different results . . . and, as you are well aware . . . with VERY different implications.

In brief, the DNA amplification method, PCR, doubles the amount of what it is searching amongst to find what it is looking for every time a cycle is run. The more times you double up by running further cycles, the more chance there is of finding something teeny-weeny lurking inside of you. But, just as Professor Dolores Cahill explained in relation to PCR not being sequenced in order to prove that they are actually looking for SARS-CoV-2, this PCR cycle process increases the likelihood of false positives the more cycles the test is passed through. This is a PROVEN FACT!

Are any of us told how many cycles our tests are being run through? And why are they NOT all the same number of cycles, with precisely the same test, everywhere? Why one test for one, and one for another? This cycle process leaves the PCR ‘test' so clearly open to wild abuse, as if you really wanted someone, or indeed many people, to test positive, then all you do is increase the test cycles. Turn the cycles knob up a bit . . . POSITIVE, turn it down . . . NEGATIVE.

Even Anthony Fauci, the big boss of America’s Internationally-recognised stance on COVID-19 contagion, has openly stated that anything over 35 cycles is “entirely meaningless”, and that results of such tests cannot be taken seriously, and they certainly cannot, under any circumstances whatsoever, be accepted as verification of a viral infection. So, Fauci himself says that anything over 35 cycles is no good, pointless, meaningless. Remember that . . .

My online searching to find details about PCR cycles as it relates to manufactured test kits was time consuming to say the least. What number of cycles are these PCR ‘tests’ being run at? I wanted to know. However, this information, like most all of that associated with COVID-19, is not easy to find ‘public information’ that’s offered to us openly by our ‘official’ health advisers and self-proclaimed disease experts. However, after some time searching, I stumbled across a video made by an investigative journalist who had undertaken the entire task ahead of me.

This investigative journalist shared details of the first five PCR test kit details that were offered up to him, all within moments of his search beginning. The manufacturers of the five tests he detailed were Gnomegen, Quest Diagnostics, Luminex, GK, and InBios. The lowest of all these, in terms of the number of cycles that their tests are run at, was Gnomegen, which is set at 39 cycles. So, just for starters here, the LOWEST of these five examples is already found to be set above and beyond what Fauci himself terms MEANINGLESS! One other test kit is set at 40 cycles, two of them at 45, and the one from Quest is set at 50 cycles. ALL entirely meaningless. All pre-manufactured purposeful instruments of FRAUD.

Why are ANY of them set at so many cycles if it is a clearly evidenced FACT - one acknowledged openly by Anthony Fauci - that the more cycles you run the test at, the more false positive results you get, and that all such results are meaningless? How did these tests get to market if they are known to drive guaranteed positive-infection results at such high cycles? Could it be corruption?!

What do the World Health Organisation have to say about PCR . . ?

A brilliant young man by the name of Dan Astin-Gregory, who has been researching and doing podcasts about COVID for quite some time, directed me towards a few useful pieces of information relating to PCR. The first was an update note to lab technicians on the website of the World Health Organisation (WHO), the globe-reaching health body that is driving the whole COVID-19 narrative. The WHO’s notice is called ‘WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020-05; Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2’, and it was updated on 13th January 2021, so is fresh-out-of-the-box info:

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

In plain English, this means that PCR is NOT how diagnosis of infection is confirmed. As the WHO say themselves, it is to be used as an ‘aid’ for diagnosis, NOT ‘for’ diagnosis. Whatever happened to going to the Doctor? Now, you wait in your car at a drive-through and let a complete stranger stick a long test kit into the back of your nasal cavity, then take it away to God only knows where for some complete random to message you with your grossly unreliable results.

Dan’s podcast about PCR also included information from the website of Swiss Policy Research, (swprs.org) which is an independent, nonpartisan and nonprofit research group investigating geopolitical propaganda in Swiss and international media. SPR is composed of independent academics and receives no external funding. Here is what they have to say about PCR in their article called ‘The Trouble With PCR Tests’ from November 2020:

Already in mid-March, SPR explained that the highly sensitive PCR tests are prone to producing false-positive results and their individual predictive value may easily drop below 50%. The issues with PCR tests are numerous:

1. There can be large-scale test kit contamination, as both the US and the UK (and several African countries) discovered during the early phase of the pandemic.

2. There can be testing site or lab contamination, which has led to countless false positive results, school closures, nursing home quarantines, canceled sports events, and more.

3. The PCR test can react to other coronaviruses. According to lab examinations, this happens in about 1% to 3% of cases if only one target gene is tested, as is the case in many (but not all) labs and as the WHO itself has recommended to avoid ambiguous positive/negative test results.

4. The PCR test can detect non-infectious virus fragments weeks after an active infection, or from an infection of a contact person, as the US CDC confirmed.

5. The PCR test can detect viable virus in quantities too small to be infectious (see below).

A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 35 to 40 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles.

The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture.

This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher.

How much more of this can we take?! We know that many, if not most, PCR test kits are set at more than 35 cycles, which means that we are all being told a great untruth. I could go on and on and on with details from scientists, doctors, and researchers alike, ALL telling you that this PCR test is utter bollocks. It tells us nothing and it is obviously being used fraudulently to drive up the panic, and to maintain the lockdowns. Why this is being done is a whole other story. The SPR finish their article, ‘The Trouble With PCR Tests’, by saying:

In conclusion, while PCR tests at high-risk places like hospitals, nursing homes and other sensitive locations are vital and undisputed, the benefit of mass PCR testing in the general population, which is costing mid-sized countries billions, may be somewhat more debatable.

Well, there’s a word . . . debatable. How can false positives of 97% or higher possibly warrant the use of the word debatable?! If up to 97 out of 100 people tested are being told they have a deadly virus within them when they clearly may not, how can this in any way be debatable? In my mind, even if the test were 1% unreliable, it should NOT be being used, and absolutely not as the ONLY means of diagnosis!

I also question their statement here that PCR in high-risk places are “vital and undisputed”. How possible?! Do these places have a test that is proven to work with no false positives whatsoever? Of course NOT!

35 + cycles = 95% FALSE POSITIVE

In summary . . .

Surely a test is a test is a test? But PCR is NOT a test, plain and simple. For some reason, which may just be money, these politicians and their scientific advisers all want us to be testing. They want us positively afraid of each-other, suffering sufficiently to sign up for their cure; vaccines.

From all that I have read and seen from the likes of Kary Mullis and other scientists and medical professionals, I am firmly of the belief that PCR is entirely unfit for purpose. It is being used incorrectly and inappropriately, and therefore it stands that we should NOT be relying upon it to dictate economy-crashing and life-ruining policies. It’s straight-up FRAUD. I do not believe a single word of it, and I am convinced that we are victim to a global corruption sting of a size never witnessed before. Why this is happening is a whole other story, but for now, this story of contagion, testing, and vaccines, has to be known by many many more among us as a LIE before any of us go back to anything resembling the old normal. The test is plunging us face-first into the abyss of a very unpleasant looking and wholly uncertain new normal.

Your life situation has changed a lot this last year, and most of us are completely unaware of the real scientific reasoning as to why. The majority among us have taken it on face value that there is an all-new ‘deadlier than flu’ disease among us, that the PCR test is medically and scientifically valid, and that we simply must do as we are told by our government and their advisers in order to save humanity from imminent self-extinction. It’s been HEADLINE news daily for the last 10 months, so of course that’s what you would tend to believe. Most believe that PCR is a proper test for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, and most believe that our only hope of any kind of ‘normal’ life ahead is a vaccine. This is what we are being told, but both of these trains of thought, and the recommendations driven by those who sell these ideas to us, are entirely unfounded LIES!

If you feel that you already know all that you will ever need to know about COVID-19 to make sensible, responsible, and beneficial decisions about your future, including those surrounding the all-new vaccines, PCR testing processes, and the ‘official’ medical advice that we are all being offered, then good. If you are 100% certain and comfortable with your future in a World of huge collective uncertainty, one spearheaded by those that are demonstrably lying to you on an epic scale, then all I can offer you is good luck.

By reading this I hope that you learn something about COVID that you didn’t know before. You will see NONE of this from your TV or from the printed press, or for that matter from your politicians or your nation’s ‘official’ health advisers. You may or may not know, but social media censorship is at an all-time high, with any commentary that goes against the ‘official’ government-driven COVID narrative being fact-checked, dumbed down, deleted, or banned. Freedom of speech is a thing of our past, which, in such times of global crisis - a very real crisis that stands on a very fake test - it seems utterly ridiculous to believe anything else that we are being told about the whole COVID-19 pandemic, and any other alleged pandemics beforehand for that matter too.

I have done my best here to bring to you some vital commentary from highly experienced and highly respected medical professionals, scientists, the creator of PCR himself, and various others on the issues at hand. I hope that you can spend some of your own time discovering the truth (whatever that means nowadays?!) for yourself.

Hey, name me one thing more important?!

Deesy